🔗 Share this article

Just two days before the NYC race for mayor, political analyst Michael Lange made a bold forecast – not just the winner overall, but precinct by precinct. The analyst, a political analyst who grew up in New York City, devoted over a decade in progressive politics and emerged as a kind of local celebrity recently for his deep dives into city data and voter surveys.

He released his highly detailed prediction map – which correctly forecast that Zohran Mamdani would win although failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his Substack, the Narrative War. He possesses a talent for witty coinages. He highlighted, for instance, the split between the “commie corridor”, stretching from one neighborhood to another area to Astoria, where he forecasted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would win by large leads, and the “capitalist corridor” on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, certain media outlets and Wall Street Journal surpass the New York Times” in audience and the majority of electors leaned toward the independent, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Trends and Surprises

What was your night?

I had to do that because they were dropping approximately 200K votes into the system every few minutes! I felt a little nervous at the beginning: Mamdani was ahead the early vote by 12 points, but there were two big batches of votes that came in after that and his lead went from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

You know, there was a world where yesterday turned out kind of poorly for him, where Cuomo was going to end up essentially increasing his support from the Democratic primary. However the winner added 500,000 votes to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He campaigned and greatly broadened his support from the primary.

Expanding Support

How did the mayor-elect gain additional support from?

He built the coalition that the left long aimed for: diverse racially, youthful, tenants and individuals facing cost pressures. He gained significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the earlier election. Additionally he boosted his base of left-leaning activists, youthful radicals, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without making those significant inroads.

He built the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: multiracial, youthful, tenants and residents squeezed by affordability

There were also a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a real thing, confined to working-class Latinos, Asian communities and Muslims. Voters in ethnic enclaves that went for Trump previously backed the progressive this year. However I wouldn’t say he was winning over white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Voter Participation and Effects

A major development of the election was the sky-high participation. Who did that help?

Both sides. Participation was significantly higher than anticipated. I thought we might go over two million, but it reached 2.3M – that is a huge number of participants. There was a decent opposition group, energized, but his supporters was also motivated, and that was enough to win.

You forecasted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Currently it appears he’s likely to surpass half. He has just over 50% but remain probably 200K ballots uncounted at that time. So I don’t think it’s definitive, but I think probable, and I hope he achieves it because afterwards none can claim Sliwa was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

The GOP candidate, the Republican candidate, is the other big story. His support completely collapsed.

He lost a single precinct in any area. Including one neighborhood in Staten Island, which is like an highly conservative area. That really was unexpected. The independent kept Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and devout communities, and plus gained many Republicans on the island with a strong turnout. I think there was a lot of strategic balloting by GOP voters. This happened before Trump endorsed for Cuomo, but it assisted. It could have even turned the tide if Mamdani’s coalition failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your often-discussed left-wing base – did backing for the candidate overwhelming in those parts of the boroughs?

In my view existed a little dilution of the progressive zone in some areas like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, instance, the Greek landlords and residents supported the independent. So there existed some opposition. However no, mostly the commie corridor is another huge reason why Mamdani won – he scored between 77% and 83% in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

Prior to the election there was coverage on whether the candidate was gaining ground with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he did?

Exist areas with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – like Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he did well. However in the affluent districts like the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance definitely mattered in those places. Likewise in the more middle-class Jewish areas like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored Cuomo. Plus, there are Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in the borough, who were strongly Cuomo. So I don’t know if existed crazy narrative-busters on this one, but he did hold more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what New York represents in politics? Will commie corridor become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest figures from the left hail from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I’m sure that there will be additional examples – people will come from these areas to be elevated nationally.

But I believe that every city in the US could develop their own commie corridor. Urban places are the epicenters of leftwing power in the nation – since youth reside there, tenancy is common and they are places where people are crushed by the inequalities we face.