🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn connections viewing you as a thought leader? Do numerous commenters praising your insights on expanding your business? Are headhunters reaching out to explore opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the explanation could be that you're not male.

The Test: Modifying Gender Identity for Better Visibility

Dozens of women joined a collective LinkedIn experiment recently after viral posts indicated that changing their profile gender to "male" enhanced their platform visibility.

Some participants modified their professional summaries to include what they called "masculine-oriented" language - inserting results-driven business buzzwords like "drive", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Based on reports, their exposure also improved.

Systemic Preference Concerns Brought Up

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether a built-in gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm favors male users who employ professional networking terminology.

Like many large social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to determine which content are shown to which users - boosting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but stated it does not consider "personal characteristics" when deciding post visibility. Rather, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" affect how posts are received.

Changing gender in your settings does not affect how your content appears in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who changed her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "Simon E", described remarkable outcomes.

"The numbers I'm seeing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, started testing after observing her reach decrease substantially.

The Method

• First, she changed her gender to "man"
• Then, she used AI tools to rephrase her professional summary using "male-coded" wording
• Finally, she repurposed old posts with comparable "assertive" language

The outcome was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in reach within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Despite the success, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the approach.

"Before, my posts were more personal - brief and clever, but also friendly and human," she stated. "Currently, the masculine version was assertive and confident - like a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She discontinued the test after seven days, stating "Every day I persisted, and outcomes got better, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Not all testers experienced positive results. One writer who changed both her profile gender to "male" and her race to "white" described a decrease in reach and engagement.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it functions in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These tests occur alongside continuing discussions about LinkedIn's unique role as both a business platform and social space.

Platform modifications in the past few months have reportedly caused female creators experiencing significantly reduced visibility, resulting in informal experiments where the same posts by male and female users received dramatically unequal reach.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to categorize and distribute content based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company states it frequently assesses its systems, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

Company representative proposed that current reductions in some users' reach might stem from higher volume due to more content on the platform.

Changing Landscape

As one participant noted, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she commented. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly competitive and unpredictable."